Unique Way

A U.S. citizen owes every man courtesy (general conduct— to positive encouragement),
fairness (practical law — to sustenance) ,
liberty (innate requirement — to inspired heights) ,
and the basic means to survive (universal backup plan — base safeguards for all humanity).

Every country with a democracy, means each 1 single person is given supreme power. With inclusion of America, as a democratic citizen each person has the fullest degree of power.
A premium for the U.S is the Declaration of Independence. It states and encourages the certain absolute Right of each person to pursue his or her own happiness.
To care and value humanity is to cherish human liberty. For each conscious adult it permits the right to choose his/her own preference or way — including a unique plan to an ideal life for happiness.
God, or any God, as well has given the quality of complete independence to humanity, or guides only those who want it or are crucial to a Holy plan.
Thus, 1 supreme power of any 1 man can select from his ideals and wishes to seek any height of course, goal, or relationship.
2 supreme powers of any 2 persons in agreement for a relationship are allowed to choose their own fates, if it’s to a legal goal, and is permissible without concern of additional opinions.

Nature embeds the universal principle of natural attracting or repelling, as a magnet, into all animals.
If basic man goes to a fruit, eats it, and likes it, it builds attraction. If basic man goes to spoiled fruit, eats it, and dislikes it, it builds repulsion.
It’s the same with people. If you like or love someone you naturally attract to that person.
The truest bonds are the ones made by attraction. If it’s a job, as with a co-worker, and you’re not meant to be in a relationship, the compensation of money may permit you temporary approval with a person who repulses. Although bonds without attraction, that are not true, are temporary, and off the job site the result is a waste of time.
Courtesy of manners or friendliness gives each self the inclination of causing a natural attraction for others.
In any case where there is a question about a relationship, you can ask one practical question:
How does this person help me?
If he helps, he benefits, he attracts.
If any person can be popular and buy a new motorcycle, or can fly in the air, how does that directly help me? Does it directly give me a new motorcycle, or give me wings?
Hypothesize, I’m a professional soccer player on a soccer team. If a basketball team wins, how does their win directly help me in soccer?

If a citizen includes the Declaration of Independence, then the citizen is independent from any relationship of the person’s choosing.
Like molded, bitter, or tasteless fruit, if a person is not agreeable with you, you naturally repel or don’t attract. Repelling permanently retreats from a relation through departing and forgetting about it.
In an extreme case, I inwardly owe friendliness to a killer because he is intrinsically a human being with the utmost value (or its potential). Yet, for my own means to survive, I naturally repel from him, and I don’t owe a friendship to a killer.
Thus, friendliness does not mean friendship. Yet, we owe friendliness or courtesy to every person, i.e. we would not go to another person and spit on him.
Anyone can choose to be independent from any relationship.
A potentially abusive relationship, would naturally cause a repelling effect.
The world abounds sufficiently enough that if we can’t have one, we can have the other. If we can’t have the other, we can have another.

If care and independence is not present for each unique human plan, an unguided leadership (like a nation’s government) would allow any others to replace a person’s will and his/her disapproval of choice, with their own choices that can even harm, neglect, and devalue that person without restraint, where the identity of someone is totally lost.
The same manner of leadership might damage and crash another’s life until his identity no longer exists, then in a like uncaring manner would avoid taking responsibility for the loss.
To value someone is to preserve a uniqueness of each self. To erase a unique personality is to destroy human value.
Whenever men ponder a friendship that doesn’t naturally attract and suit a personal preference,
You may conjure the extreme scenario of Julius Caesar in the story of the “Ides of March”.

Does that person mainly give and benefit , or does the person mainly take and subtract?
Without practical benefit to you, can you place an attention on someone of higher probability to benefit you -
in a character who has an actual perceivable return of friendliness?
You can fill your life with people who like or love you.
Or, you can fill your life with people who dislike you.
Is a person your true friend?

If a person, group, or nation becomes autonomous, and by their own autonomy without outside influence choose the way of harmony, noninterference, and nonviolence with the world,
then his or their demeanor is a peaceful one, and he or they are not a natural threat to anyone to need outside management.
If with these qualities they choose friendliness, then he or they are benevolent and beneficial by nature, to a boundless time.
He or they can rather likely aid as a supplemental resource, and when genuine friendship is offered he or they counteract with the propensity for friendliness or friendship.

_________________________________________________________

Posted: September 5, 2026, 1:30am pdt