Quick Write

People seem to disagree with the paper "Summary".
I feel nothing in the blog has a sincere offense. Nonetheless, I had shown the blog material at a delicate time. That wasn't intentional, but accidental. Since it was accidental and shown at an improper time, eventually it was polite to take down the blog. I took it down.
I'm sorry to post the blog immediately after the great news.
That night I didn't know Mipa's great news happened; It was early morning when I posted "Summary"; I was extremely tired after hours of work; so I took 1 whole day off. I discovered the great news late.
The subjects of the paper were created for essential defense.
The subjects are about:
A) The story and interaction of Mipa and I.
B) That Mipa and I do not have a friendship, and to explain his offer of friendship using force.
C) Mipa has been pursuing colors for the motive of ladies.
 

Also, I had discarded 1 main color. Afterwards, about 1 month later Mipa had great experiences with powerful people in sharing color (that I discarded). That's absolutely fine. There is no problem about having a good time with people.

I described the story through facts and my observations faithfully to tell a true story, even though the actions of the person is what gives the story a positive or negative effect. If I tell plainly what Mipa did, and you think it's negative, is that my fault?
For a more extreme example, if I said, " A girl angrily hit a boat with a bat," when it's true, is it my fault that it sounds negative?

I told, Mipa will keep pursuing my colors specifically.
The point is, during his pursuit I really wish to keep the bear icon.

________

Posted: Aug 29, 2024, 1:50am pst